Tuesday, 26 October 2010

Losing my Religion

I have recently been driven to evolving my previously static thoughts on the whole complicated and often controversial God Issue. Having been brought up a 'major catholic' and if truth be told been a little 'hard-line' in my past, I had settled into a giving the whole debate what can only be described as a stiff ignoring. The arrival of my children at a questioning age means I have had to develop a position....
And here, at the moment are my current thoughts...
To begin with I have nothing against the Catholic Faith per se, but as I hope to explain  I am against the whole idea of faith ‘handed down’ through the generations.  I fundamentally believe that there are universal moral ideals of right and wrong, from which we as humans have developed our sense of justice. The origin of this deep seated feeling may well be a higher spiritual power, and although I have no proof, I believe deep down there to be a higher power of some sort who loves creation with an unconditional love.
This unconditional love is important and is one of the main reasons that whilst I accept a higher power, I reject all forms of organised conditional religion as a mechanism to access this higher power. All religions claim the truth, demand  strict conditions and have been created by men to control men (and more often than not to subjugate women) – is that really the way to access an unconditional source of love?  I argue that the source of most of the misery in the world is fundamental belief which refuses to compromise and rejects reason. This fundamental beliefs main weapon in order to succeed is always faith. Be it the Nazis, the Communists, the Catholic Church, Muslims, Cults, Masons, Evangelicals or Green Peace; all base their arguments ultimately on faith in the absence of compelling evidence to support their assertions. I also reject other ‘faith’ based practises which have no basis in fact, such as the majority of alternative medicine, the occult, faith healers, spiritualists etc.   
In order to embed this faith within the followers of the movement a variety of psychological practises are used, ceremony, precedence, authority, social proof etc, by far one of the most insidious ways that this brainwashing occurs is by targeting children before they have the mental capacity to make their own choices.  I myself have suffered with this during my upbringing.  By associating my love for my Mum and hers for me with a belief in Catholicism (the same can be said for the love of God), reinforced by schooling I was prevented from making my own choices as to what I believed until after my mum died and I was freed from the guilt to make my own choices. It was deeply unfair that I was made to feel guilty and uncomfortable whilst learning about evolution, physics or the history of the universe (which is wondrous) because I felt I was betraying my mum’s belief in 7 day creation etc – I will see no such intellectually stifling guilt passed onto my children.  Since making my way in the world I have seen many horrors visited upon human beings by their fellow human beings, I believe that certain behaviours are right and certain are wrong, and all of us deep down understand the difference (unless they are sociopaths).  A persons actions should be judged by the actions alone, too often under the banner of religion or fundamental belief as I prefer to call it, I have witnessed evil deeds performed by misguided good men and evil men excusing evil in religions name; The Croatian Catholics, evil people using the ‘catholic church’ to do good by ethnically cleansing villages, the misguided suicide bomber, often an  ordinary children with a good heart perverted by fundamentalism into killing innocents.
 History is littered with such examples from Gulag death squads to the Cathar Crusade, mankind using their faith to justify what they deep down know to be wrong – only fundamental belief can do this. The roasted pork my Muslim friend Bash avoids because it feels wrong is part of the same ‘faith’ which led to the twin towers, as soon as reason is dispelled all is possible from witch hunts to the final solution, people must think for themselves and take responsibility.  I spoke at length to Mullahs in Afghanistan, often good men but clearly a major part of the problem within that society, to me they were clearly misguided even tragically comical. However, I thought this because they were alien to my culture, had I been born in a Muslim family (a random act of fate) I would have had a completely different view on their ‘madness’.  An Afghan expressed amusement to me about our own Anglican padre who they thought was crazy and confused – the only difference between us was the cultural prism through which the different fundamental beliefs were viewed.  I did get the children christened but for cultural and family reasons in the same way I enjoy Christmas and Bonfire night,  it is part of who we are as a family- this may well be an example of gross hypocrisy for which I apologise but do not regret.  

My Children will grow up (I hope) to respect life and act according to a deep seated sense of right and wrong, an ability to asses ideas and situations individually based on the evidence available and take full responsibility for their actions -they do not require a priest / rabbi / guru / pastor or mullah to do this. If when they are adults they wish to explore any faith they will do so forearmed with critical thinking and mature emotions.  I believe believe in a higher power and am happy with my access to it.
Regards

5 comments:

Bravo Zulu said...

Hogman,

I'm glad to see you're back to your writing. It's been a while. And I'm particularly happy to see you address the God question. Having said that, I'm afraid your comments have many inconsistencies. I can say this, because you sound a lot like me from a few years ago. You say you believe in an objective truth, and God, but not "organized religion" or "passing on the faith". Organized religion is exactly what we were instructed to create by Jesus himself (in the case of Christianity)! Of course, humans being humans, much has been done (and will continue to be done)in the name of religion that is not in keeping with the teachings of that religion. But far more good than bad is done every single day, all around the world, in the name of religion.
And as for "passing on the faith", if you believe something to be objectively good and true, would you not want to educate your children in that which you believe to be good and true? Suggesting that you avoid the subject until they "have the mental capacity to make their own decisions" is like saying, as a parent, I'm not going to instruct my child on the perils of crossing the street without looking both ways until they can decide for themselves how they want to cross the street.
Regarding the question of science, evolution, and our origins, I think you would be amazed and pleasantly surprised at the Catholic Church's teaching in these areas. The Catholic Church is, in fact, responsible for the first centers of learning (i.e. universities) in Europe and the education system as we know it today. Science is certainly not inconsistent with the church. The church encourages scientific research knowing that the outcome can only be in support of what the church knows to be true. What we often confuse in today's world, however, is hypothesis for fact. Many scientific "facts" are not facts at all, but hypotheses. One of those is the theory of evolution. This theory, contrary to popular belief, does not answer the question of our origin as species (I use this phrase intentionally given the title of Darwin's famous book). Evolution, per se, is also not inconsistent with the teachings of the Catholic Church. And while you say there are no "facts" to support our faith, applying the scientific process, there is actually far more to substantiate the conclusion that there is a God than there is "evidence" to support many of the common scientific hypotheses we accept as "fact" today.
And while I loved your mum too (best English breakfast ever), and have certain respect for those who believe literally the creation story in Genesis, it's worth noting that the Catechism of the Catholic Church states that the seven day creation time line is not literal. Anyway, there is much more to be said about the content of your post. Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, etc. all came to the conclusion that there is a God. And they did so by asking the question "Why?" and truthfully seeking the answer. So by asking the question, you're on the right road...

The Hog said...

BZ

Thankyou for your response, I will address some of your points.
I said I believe in a higher power, not necessarily God and certainly not in the way portrayed by the Middle Eastern religions - it may be nothing more than the balance of nature or the collective energies of humanity, who knows but I certainly do not think it demands an organisation of any kind to support it. And I am against any sort of 'Faith' being passed on with the exception of the tooth fairy and Father Christmas. I am agnostic in that I do not -not believe in a higher power but I do not also have any proof, I feel the same way about Aliens, I would not completely rule out their existence but I have yet to see proof (and by that I mean scientific not anecdotal).
I think you miss understand me as regards children, my intent is to not teach them that something is so when I cannot be sure it is and I do not want them to be forced into decisions without the capacity for choice, my only exception to this rule is my teaching them to support West Ham Utd - this is a cruel fate to inflict on a child - a lifetime of misery but in that respect I can be mean.
We will have to disagree about the amount of good that is being done in the world V the amount of bad in the name of religion but in terms of big issues the US led Wars on both Terror and Drugs are killing alot of people and are both driven by an underlying American obsession with religious war.
I am aware of the Catholics church stance on scientific matters, but also aware that it currently tolerates some pretty dodgy practises in its areas of growth (like Africa) whilst allowing a more enlightened view in the west.

Anyhow, that aside, when are we going to meet up? Things look set for you in Canada and we have a house in France?

NNG said...

"What do you believe in?" asked David.
"I believe in those whom I love and trust. All else is foolishness. This god is as empty as his church. His followers choose to attribute all of their good fortune to him, but when he ignores their pleas or leaves them to suffer, they say only that he is beyond their understanding and abandon themselves to his will. What kind of god is that?" - Roland, disgraced knight, The Book of Lost Things by John Connolly.

The Hog said...

Fella, a top top book and I had forgotten that quote

Anonymous said...

@Bravo Zulu
You misunderstand (or deliberately or misrepresent) what the words "theory" and “hypothesis” means to scientists. Religious people do this all the time: it’s a shibboleth. It's not hypothesis and fact that are confused, it's hypothesis and theory. Gravity is only a “theory" after all, and it would be demoted to a hypothesis tomorrow if one single apple fell upwards.

Science, unlike religion, does not do "facts". It has no revealed truths and no absolute certainties. It is a scientist's ability to say, “I was wrong” that makes it so powerful and so useful. Imperfect and misunderstood but really, really useful. Faith based world-views do not have this built in self-correction.

As for the theory of evolution, this does in fact, answer the questions on the origin of species (I, too, use this phrase intentionally given the (actual) title of Darwin's famous book).

Coupled with bags of evidence from almost every scientific discipline it answers these questions very well - certainly much better than saying "god did it, I read it in a book". (Of course it doesn't answer how life first came about but it has never claimed to, "contrary to popular belief".)

P.S.
Whilst European universities do have their roots in Christian schools, this is simply a historical artefact. Universities only started to thrive in the early 13th century when Papal bulls gave them autonomy and the freedom from church censorship (about the same time as the Papal Inquisition started: you know, the one that persecuted Galileo because there was a hypothesis that the Earth went round the Sun and he helped collect evidence to support the theory of heliocentricity. After he was formally pardoned by the Church in 1992 it might even be accepted as a fact nowadays. Stranger things have happened.